<통일·북한 정보 아카이브>
Total  0

통일과나눔 아카이브 8000만

전체메뉴

학술논문

‘『응향』결정서’를 둘러싼 해방기 문단의 인식론적 차이 연구

A Study on epistemological differences in the liberation period literary world over ‘『Unghyang』 written-decision’

상세내역
저자 오태호
소속 및 직함 경희대학교
발행기관 중앙어문학회
학술지 어문론집
권호사항 48
수록페이지 범위 및 쪽수 37-64
발행 시기 2026년
키워드 #『Unghyang』,『Unghyang』 written-decision   #liberation period literary world   #North Korean literature   #socialist realism   #schematism   #sociality of literature   #autonomy of literature   #오태호
조회수 7
원문보기
상세내역
초록
The magazine having such a character as literary coterie magazine was scheduled to be published as a ‘Book of poems in memory of liberation’ in Wonsan Literary Union, However, as ideological criteria apply as the basis for evaluation under the pretext of cleaning up the vestige of Japanese imperialism and new social construction by North Korea Art Federation, 『Unghyang』 is reduced in its value as the hotbed of artistic for art’s sake and escapist unsound spirit. As a result, there occurred the blind North Korean-type independent literary theory aiming at mechanically applying principles of realism, with the principle of literary autonomy and diversity excluded, that intends to 『Unghyang』 Accident corresponds to incidental and essential accidents that occurred in the process of re-organization of North Korean literary immediately after the liberation. The political viewpoint that aesthetic autonomy of literature becomes obstacles in constructing new socialism shows literature for a political party aiming at ‘literature as tools for revolution and construction’ instead of acknowledging diversity of literature. This is the situation where 『Unghyang』 Accident is. It can be said that, after that, the literary persons and works that disappeared in the process of struggle against denominations were mostly victims of 『Unghyang』 Accident in that the first step in convicting an individual and literary works in the name of an organization is 『Unghyang』. 『Unghyang』 Accident can be said to be the first accident stressing the appropriateness that an accident must support literary autonomy in that literature has always expanded its area running a risk between taboo and violation. In addition, the tendency surrounding 『Unghyang』 written-decision in and outside the literary world proposes not self-examination that 『Unghyang』 must not be simply regarded as where South Korean literature and North Korean or purity and political nature are separated and but self-examination that literature is placed somewhere between social contribution of literature and individual expressive freedom.
목차