통일과나눔 아카이브 8000만

전체메뉴

학위

  • HOME
  • 논문
  • 학위

전후 북한의 사회주의 이행과 '자력갱생' 경제의 형성

Jaryeokgaengsaeng Economy : North Korea's Socialist Transition and Its Formation in 1953~63

상세내역
초록
This thesis sheds light on the characteristics of the North Korean socialist economic system through the concept of the Jaryeokgaengsaeng (自力更生) economy. The Jaryeokgaengsaeng economy is an economic structure with two levels: a self-reliant economy at the national level and a self-sufficient economy at the local level. In the 1960s, North Korea pursued not only the economic independence of the nation but also the self-sufficiency of the local economy under the slogan of Jaryeokgaengsaeng. In order to understand the characteristics of this economic structure, the thesis reviews the socialist transition process from the Korean War Armistice to the early 1960s. Focusing on the Soviet Union’s role in the process, this research shows that the Soviet Union’s continuous restraints on the radical socialist transition line of the Korean Workers’ Party (KWP) resulted in the de-Sovietization of North Korea. As a result, North Korea’s socialist system became strongly oriented toward a self-reliant economy, and the Jaryeokgaengsaeng economy was formed based on the historical­geopolitical conditions of its realization at that time.
After the liberation of Korea from Japan, North Korean communists pursued a balanced economic development and long-term socialist transition based on the theory of people’s democracy and national self-reliance. However, this idea began to be doubted because of the influence of post-people’s democracy theory, introduced in North Korea around 1949. The Korean War also provided momentum for the radical socialist transition line. As the US military stayed in South Korea after the Armistice, North Korea’s self-knowledge of being at the forefront of the Cold War led to ideological radicalization. This was based on the interpretation of subjectivist materialism in the leadership of the KWP and Hwang Jang Yeop, who theorized the idea of Juche, supported the logic of the radical socialist transition line.
The greatest unease in the KWP’s radical socialist transition line was that it conflicted with the Soviet Union. The KWP line, based on the subjectivist interpretation of historical materialism, had a fundamental difference from the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) line, which emphasized the correspondence of productivity and production relations. Furthermore, the CPSU collective leadership that emerged after Stalin’s death sought to overwhelm the capitalist world through a political and economic means in the principle of peaceful coexistence that was fundamentally different from the former foreign policy. For this reason, the CPSU directly pushed Malenkov’s “new course” of North Korea’s Three-Year Plan(1954~56) for the post-war reconstruction of in September 1953. In April 1955, it engaged in making North Korea’s First Five-Year Plan(1957~61) and agricultural policy.
The continued intervention of the CPSU in economic policy and political lines provided Kim Il Sung with the direct motivation to implement de-Sovietization in North Korea. Since 1955, Kim Il Sung had attempted to deviate from the influence of the Soviet Union, including the massive campaign against the Soviet fraction of North Korea. Kim’s radical socialist transition line had led to the de-Sovietization of North Korea in antagonizing Khrushchev’s new foreign policy. Simultaneously, it meant that Kim had to stand alone at the forefront of the East Asian Cold War without outside help.
However, the situational assessment of the KWP leadership was far from pessimistic. As Khrushchev and Mao Zedong did in the late 1950s, North Korean leaders believed that socialism was inherently superior to capitalism. They were caught up in a modernist dream that the Soviet Union and North Korea would overtake the United States and South Korea, respectively, and transform to communism. Accordingly, the KWP adopted the First Five-Year Plan, which further emphasized a drive for rapid growth and a development strategy that put heavy industry ahead of everything.
Such a modernist dream for the KWP carried over into attempts to build communist communities, or communes, at the local level. Like the “Great Leap” and the people’s commune movement in China, the unification of agricultural cooperatives was attempted and building of a local self-sufficiency system was sought through the development of local industries in North Korea. Like little furnaces built in North Korea imitating the Chinese “backyard furnaces (土法高爐),” ideas such as “the use of its own resources” and “Jaryeokgaengsaeng” were shared by China and North Korea.
Another such ideal, the self-sufficiency policy at the local level, had a realistic purpose of securing investment in the heavy industry by saving national investment in the light industry and improving people’s standard of living. North Korea’s local economic system, formed in the late 1950s and early 1960s, was a structure that sought an expanded reproduction with little national investment through its own resources and work forces while consuming products at the local level. In order to maintain the policy of prioritizing high-speed growth and heavy industry at the national level, Jaryeokgaengsaeng was also driven at the local level.
During the era of the Division of Korea and the Cold War, underdeveloped socialism and the historical–geographical conditions of North Korea converted from the ideals of a communist community where there was no exploitation of the rural areas by the city to the exploitation of the local economy by the state. Communism, which aims for the ideal of prosperity and cooperation, was developed as an ideological method for the survival of state and economic growth. In reality, the economy of Jaryeokgaengsaeng had a structure of self-reliance at the national level and self-escape (各自圖生) at the local level. In this context, it can be regarded as the origin of the “dual economy,” which is one of the main characteristics of today’s North Korean economy.
목차
"제1장 서론 1

제2장 전후복구와 급진적 사회주의 이행 전략의 등장 19
제1절 한국전쟁 전후의 혁명단계 인식과 사회주의 이행 구상 19
1. 급진적 이행 전략 등장의 역사적 배경 19
2. 전후의 혁명단계 인식과 사회주의 이행 구상 27
제2절 전후복구 3개년계획의 수립 39
1. 제6차 전원회의와 복구의 우선순위 39
2. 전후복구 3개년계획 초안과 균형 발전 전략 51
제3절 사회주의 이행 전략의 급진화 56
1. 전후복구 3개년계획의 왜곡과 수정 56
2. 당 강령 개정 추진과 혁명단계 규정의 변화 66
3. 1955년 4월 전원회의와 사회주의 혁명의 선언 74
제4절 1955년 봄 식량위기 82
1. 식량위기의 배경 82
1) 역사적 배경 82
2) 농업협동화의 개시와 급진화 87
2. 곡물조달의 강행과 식량위기 98

제3장 제1차 5개년계획의 난맥과 급진적 이행 전략의 관철 109
제1절 소련의 경제정책 개입과 반소련계운동 109
1. 5개년계획 초안의 작성 과정 109
2. 김일성의 모스크바 방문과 소련의 정책 개입 116
3. 1955~56년 반소련계운동과 탈소련화의 개시 121
제2절 북·소 갈등의 격화와 8월전원회의사건 133
1. 북·소 갈등의 격화: 제3차 당대회와 동유럽 순방 133
2. 북·소 갈등의 폭발과 귀결: 8월전원회의사건과 ‘반종파투쟁’ 144
제3절 농업협동화와 상공업의 사회주의적 개조의 강행 155
1. 농업협동화 155
2. 상공업의 사회주의적 개조 164
제4절 5개년계획의 수정과 급진적 전략의 관철 173
1. 제1차 당대표자대회와 5개년계획의 수정 173
2. 양곡자유거래 금지 조치의 재시행과 농업협동화의 완결 179

제4장 급진적 이행 전략의 귀결과 ‘자력갱생’ 경제의 형성 183
제1절 대외자립경제로의 변화와 5개년계획의 조기 달성 183
1. 소련 고문단의 철수와 원조의 감소 183
2. 5개년계획 조기 달성 방침과 1959년 계획의 급격한 조정 194
제2절 사회주의 개조의 공고화와 지역적 자족경제의 형성 202
1. 농업협동조합의 리 단위 통합과 생산수단의 사회적 소유 선언 202
2. 지방산업의 확대와 지역적 자족경제 209
제3절 급진적 이행전략의 귀결과 ‘자력갱생’의 등장 220
1. 고성장의 후유증: 5개년계획 달성의 불균형과 식량 부족 사태 220
2. 제2차 5개년계획의 7개년계획으로의 수정과 ‘자력갱생’ 구호의 등장 225
제4절 ‘자력갱생’ 경제의 구조 237
1. 국가적 수준: 대외자립경제 237
2. 지역적 수준: 자급자족경제 246

제5장 결론 252

참고문헌 260
ABSTRACT 279"