통일과나눔 아카이브 8000만

전체메뉴

학위

  • HOME
  • 논문
  • 학위

냉전기 북한의 진영외교 전환에 관한 연구

A Study on the transition of Democratic People's Republic of Korea's Encampment Diplomacy in the Cold War

상세내역
저자 박아름
학위 박사
소속학교 동국대학교
전공 북한학과 대외관계
발행연도 2020년
쪽수 272
지도교수 김용현
키워드 #박아름   #북한   #진영외교   #냉전   #탈냉전   #김일성   #김정일   #조-소 국경조약   #코메콘
원문보기
상세내역
초록
A Study on the transition of Democratic People's Republic of Korea's Encampment Diplomacy in the Cold WarPark ah reumDepartment of North Koreans StudiesGraduate School of Dongguk UniversityThis study focuses on the change and role of Democratic People's Republic of Korea(DPRK)'s domestic politics by borrowing partial concepts of modern authoritarian regimes based on Peter Gourevitch's second image reversed theory in order to claim Encampment Diplomacy which was named as cause resulting the crisis of DPRK in the 1990s as a response against crisis selected by DPRK in 1980s. DPRK's encampment diplomacy in Cold War system had experienced 'growth-weakening-strengthening' as opposed to the flow of cold war 'growth-stabilization-decrease'. That is DPRK's encampment diplomacy was not linear until the Cold War system and DPRK which sought to escape from the socialist camp in the early 1960s turned to a socialist camp to overcome the crisis in the mid-1980s.In 1962 the Soviet Union recommended DPRK to join Council for Economic Mutual Assistance(Comecon) in order to complete the socialist international labor division system through the Comecon but DPRK refused it. At that time the DPRK leadership the 'Man-Ju Pa' decided to deteriorate its relationship with the Soviet Union for the first time in order to continue the heavy industrial priority policy and nuclear development. In the early 1960s it can be said that domestic politics played a role of blocking international pressures and then created new domestic systems and foreign policies.The border negotiations proposal by the Soviet Union's in 1984 was warmly welcomed by the leadership who wanted to complete the construction of Kim Jong-il's succession. Using the border negotiations with the Soviet Union as a ostensible reason DPRK continued to engage in military exchanges and economic cooperation through continuous contact and most of all it was able to develop and export missiles and continue nuclear weapons tests as well as resolve domestic energy shortages through the construction of nuclear power plants which had been a long-cherished desire. In the mid-1980s it can be said that domestic politics played a role of 'absorbing' against international pressure and since then it has strengthened the existing domestic system and developed a logic to respond to the dissolution of the Cold War through linkage with foreign policy.Through this study it is confirmed DPRK's encampment diplomacy in the Cold War was not linear but DPRK's foreign policy has secured ‘autonomy' and 'quickness’ in international policy decision making prior to the dissolution of the Cold War while completing ‘North Korean style’ authoritarianism including Kim Il-sung centered dominance of the 'Man-Ju Pa' regime the heavy industry-first economic line and nuclear expectation and the establishment of the Kim Jong-il succession.Currently DPRK's foreign policy is in a situation in which the leadership's 'autonomy' and 'quickness' are actively demonstrated in the foreign policy decision as DPRK's nuclear development has made substantial progress since the 2000s it will be sustainable for a significant period even if it is partially influenced by the change of surrounding powerful nations. Key words Democratic People's Republic of Korea(DPRK) Kim Il-sung Kim Jong-il DPRK's encampment diplomacyThe Border Treaty between Democratic People's Republic of korea and the Soviet Union Council for Economic Mutual Assistance(Comecon) Cold War Post-Cold War.
목차
제1장 서 론 제1절 문제제기 및 연구목적 제2절 선행연구 검토 10제3절 연구범위 및 자료 22제2장 이론적 배경 26제1절 ‘제2이미지 역전이론’ 26제2절 ‘현대’ 권위주의 체제 32제3절 분석틀 40제3장 ‘현대’ 권위주의 체제와 진영외교 약화 42제1절 냉전구조 안정화와 소련의 대북압력 431. 미·소 긴장과 전략적 안정화 432. 중·소 분쟁의 심화와 ‘비동맹운동’의 성장 493. 소련의 국제분업 권유 56제2절 단일지배체제와 북·소 관계 악화 651. 김일성중심의 만주파 정권 장악 652. 중공업우선 경제노선과 핵보유 기대 703. 북‧소 관계 악화와 발전주의적 태도 78제3절 ‘자립적 민족경제’ 수립과 ‘작은동맹’ 추구 851. ‘자립적 민족경제’와 대외무역 강조 852. ‘3대혁명 력량강화’ 선포 903. 사회주의 진영과 갈등 및 ‘작은 동맹’ 추구 93제4절 소결 99제4장 ‘북한식’ 권위주의 체제와 진영외교 강화 102제1절 냉전구조 균열과 소련의 대북접근 1031. 미·소 접근과 신냉전 와해 1032. 중·소 화해와 ‘비동맹운동’의 쇠퇴 1083. 소련의 국경협상 제안 12제2절 후계체제 구축과 대소밀착 1301. 김정일 후계체제 구축 1302. 대외무역 성장과 대미접근 지속 1433. 북·소 동맹 과시와 체제보위적 태도 150제3절 대외무역 불균형과 ‘우리식 사회주의’ 모색 161. 대외무역 불균형과 대소의존 강화 162. ‘자주 친선 평화’ 희석 1673. 사회주의 진영과 결속 및 ‘우리식 사회주의’ 모색 176제4절 소결 192제5장 결 론 196참 고 문 헌 202ABSTRACT 230부 록 233