통일과나눔 아카이브 8000만

전체메뉴

학위

  • HOME
  • 논문
  • 학위

南北交流協力法制 改善에 관한 硏究 : 中國·臺灣 交流法制와의 比較를 中心으로

(A) Study on Improvement of Legislations Exchange and Cooperation between the South and North Korea : With Emphasis on the Comparative of Exchange Legislations Mainland China Taiwan

상세내역
저자 최명길
학위 박사
소속학교 國民大學校 大學院
전공 法學科 北韓法專攻
발행연도 2005년
쪽수 384p
지도교수 .
키워드 #최명길   #남북교류협력법제   #중국·대만 교류법제   #남북교류   #남북통일
원문보기
상세내역
초록
Inter-Korean exchange and cooperation, we can say that the most useful measure to improve the relationship North and South Korea, and pursuit mutuality trust establishment and profit. The activation of inter-Korean exchange and cooperation is becoming important case, compare with basic composition of our unification plan. Because, peaceful mutual agreement unification is our doctrine and goal of unification basically the relationship of North and South Korea improvement though reconciliation and cooperation.

The purposes of this study are to grasp the situation of the current statures related to inter-Korean exchange and cooperation, seek for a program for improvement of these statutes by analyzing the cause of changing and legal issues of the related laws according to change of circumstances at this time.

Our government had opened the age of inter-Korean exchange and cooperation by so-called '7·7 Declaration' in 1988, enacted the `The Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation Act' in Aug. 1, 1990 to secure the legality of the inter-Korean exchange and cooperation project to take the opportunity of the Declaration.

By series of these activities, the South and North have expanded exchange and cooperation each other. In addition, the inter-Korean exchange and cooperation is actively being realized in the multiple areas as a result of the so-called '6·15 Joint Declaration' agreed in the Inter-Korean Summit Meeting in the year of 2000.

Even if this Act has status of fundamental law headed to peaceful unification, there are some problems to be amended which are attended with insufficiency to system. and contents, too much provisions to delegate or apply, complexity of proceedings for regulation, complicated jurisdiction or duties of affairs, and so on, The direction of improvement would include in the legal principle, consistence or expectancy of policy, and the transparency of the governmental attitude.

'The Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation Act' was enacted by South Korea unilaterally by prospecting ' the problems of exchange and cooperation before unification of Korea was fully realized. That is to say, the government formed the basis of inter-Korean exchange and cooperation to be realized within the scope of legal system in South Korea so that secure the related laws and ordinances beside 'The Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation Act'.

The result are summarized as follows:

First, about legislations 'The Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation Basic Act'. Such as like basic Act inter-Korean exchange and cooperation is urgent. In this content of the basic Act, it should be involved regulation with legislation about investment encouragement and guarantee like as chinese `Taiwan Brethren Investment Protection Act' and Taiwanese below 'Act Governing Relation between Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area' that the legislations exchange of people of the Taiwan area and the Mainland is suggesting.

Second, it is necessary to enact 'The Inter-Korean Economics Exchange and Cooperation Act'(Tentatively Named) like as China and Taiwan for activation of economics exchange cooperation.

Third, it is necessary to establish 'South Korean Resident Investment Protection Law' (Tentatively Named) in North Korea. North Korea should do legalization with investment guarantee about Korean companies like as China and Taiwan residents let South Korean companies to invest feeling at rest for favorable treatment.

Fourth, like as a nonprofit organization - 'The Association for Relations Across Taiwan Straits'(ARATS) of the mainland and the 'Straits Exchange Foundation'(SEF) of Taiwan - establishment between cross-strait our government should establish 'Inter-Korean Exchange and Cooperation Promotion Agency'(Tentatively Named) as a full responsibility instrument which can divide a exchange and cooperation role with a private organization.

Fifth, South and North Korea should be taken up a positive attitude for each kind of a written agreement effectuation of South & North and attachment written agreement conclusion which is for economic cooperation's systematic guarantee.

Sixth, inter-Korean exchange and cooperation in South and North Korea, should be propel continually according to the principle of separation of politics and economics, especially let privates exchange to be active, They should improve inter-Korean exchange and cooperation related Act.

Seventh, 4 written agreement became effective situation which involve in connection with inter-Korean economic cooperation, North Korea is demanded good repair of North Korean domestic Act(Foreigner Investment Law) to improve the investment environment to let South Korean companies to invest feel easily.

Like as above mentioned, the most important thing is, it will be only alternative plan that continuous exchange & cooperation become activation in North and South Korean economics and society and guidance field.

Consequently, the way can develop and create of South and North Korea is to establish the law for supporting North Korean economics renovation and opening. Considering this point, government should prepare for getting into stride of inter-Korean exchange and cooperation. With making a reform measure, should contribute for inter-Korean exchange and Cooperation activation.
목차
目次 ⅰ

第1章 序論 1

第1節 硏究의 目的과 必要性 1

Ⅰ. 硏究目的 1

Ⅱ. 硏究의 必要性 5

第2節 硏究의 範圍와 方法 8

Ⅰ. 硏究의 範圍 8

Ⅱ. 硏究의 方法 13

第2章 南北韓 交流協力에 관한 法的基礎 15

第1節 南北交流協力의 法的 先決條件 15

Ⅰ. 南北韓의 法的 地位 15

1. 現行憲法과 北韓의 法的 地位의 衝突與否 15

2. 北韓의 法的 地位에 관한 學說 및 判例 16

Ⅱ. 南韓의 統一政策과 南北交流協力 25

1. 統一政策과 憲法問題 25

2. 統一方案과 南北交流協力 26

Ⅲ. 南韓憲法上 交流協力의 基礎 30

1. 領土條項과 統一條項의 理論 30

2. 憲法上 統一條項에 대한 法認識 33

Ⅳ. 特殊關係의 憲法的 基礎 및 理論 35

1. 特殊關係의 憲法的 基礎 35

2. 特殊關係의 法的 槪念 36

3. 對等한 政府關係의 必要性 37

Ⅴ. 南北關係의 特殊性과 南北交流協力 38

Ⅵ. 南北交流協力을 위한 南北間의 合意 41

1.「南北基本合意書」의 採擇 41

2.「南北交流協力의 移行과 遵守를 위한 附屬合意書」의 採擇 42

3. '6·15共同宣言'의 採擇 43

4. 南北經協關聯 4個 合意書의 採擇과 發效 44

第2節 南韓의 交流協力에 관한 法的基礎 46

Ⅰ. 南北의 交流協力의 實際와 法的 問題點 46

1. 南北交流協力法制와 그 問題點 46

2.「南北協力基金法」 의 內容과 問題點 55

Ⅱ. 南北交流協力에 관한 法規 57

1. 人的交流에 관한 法規 57

2. 物的交流에 관한 法規 60

Ⅲ. 南北間의 通行·通信·通航 65

1. 通行 65

2. 通信 65

3. 通航 66

第3節 北韓의 交流協力에 관한 法的 基礎 67

Ⅰ. 對外開放의 憲法的 基礎와 沿革 67

1. '2次經濟’의 公式化 71

2. 對外經濟開放의 擴大 必要性 72

3. 交流協力과 憲法的 根據 72

Ⅱ. 南北交流協力과 北韓法의 變化 75

Ⅲ. 北韓의 法律上 南北交流에 관한 理論 79

1. 北韓의 對外經濟開放에 관한 法的 根據 79

2. 北韓의 對外經濟法制의 內容 81

3. 北韓의 外國人投資法制의 內容 92

Ⅳ. 交流協力을 위한 經濟特區의 設定 95

1. 北韓의 經濟特區의 設定 95

2. 開城特區法 制定의 意義와 南北交流協力 101

3. 經濟特區의 展望 105

Ⅴ. 南北韓 經濟統合의 憲法政策의 課題 107

1. 價格自由化와 市場經濟履行 107

2. 經濟統合의 類型과 方式 108

第3章 中國·臺灣의 交流協力에 관한 法的基礎 114

第1節 兩岸關係의 形成과 交流協力의 展開樣相 114

Ⅰ. 兩岸關係의 槪念과 性格 114

1. 兩岸의 分離 114

2. 兩岸關係의 法的 槪念 114

3. 兩岸關係의 性格 115

4. 兩岸關係의 特徵 116

Ⅱ. 兩岸間의 政治的 相互關係의 設定 119

1. 中國의 '一國兩制'와 臺灣의 '一國兩區' 119

2. '하나의 中國'과 '하나의 臺灣' 120

Ⅲ. 兩岸의 憲法과 交流協力 123

1. 中國의 憲法과 交流協力 123

2. 臺灣의 憲法과 交流協力 125

Ⅳ. 兩岸間 交流協力와 展開樣相 126

1. 兩岸間의 汪辜會談 開催 126

2. 中國의 三通四流와 臺灣의 三不政策 135

V. 兩岸間의 交流協力 推進機構 146

1. 中國의 對臺灣關聯 統一政策 推進機構 146

2. 臺驚의 對中國關聯 統一政策 推進機構 149

第2節 中國의 交流協力에 관한 法的基礎 157

Ⅰ. 中國의 統一方案과 一國兩制 157

1. 一國兩制 157

2. 江八條 165

Ⅱ. 中國의 臺灣關聯 法律事務의 基本原則 172

1. 一個中國의 原則 172

2. 兩岸間 權益保護의 原則 173

3. 兩岸間 人的交流의 原則 175

Ⅲ. 臺灣關聯 法律問題와 法律事務 175

1. 臺灣關聯 法律問題의 發端 175

2. 臺灣關聯 法律事務의 槪念, 性質, 類型 178

3. 臺灣關聯 法律問題의 特徵 183

Ⅳ. 中國의 臺灣關聯 法律事務 規定 185

1. 中國의 法律體系 185

2. 法律 186

3. 行政法規와 法規性 文件 194

4. 司法解釋 195

5. 部門規定 196

6. 兩岸間의 合議 198

7. 地方性法規와 地方政府 規定 199

8. 國際條約 199

Ⅴ. 中國의 對臺灣 投資法制에 관한 內容 200

1. 中外合資經營企業法 200

2. 中外合作經營企業法 201

3. 外資企業法 202

第3節 臺灣의 對中國 交流協力에 관한 法的基礎 204

Ⅰ. 臺灣의 大陸政策 204

1. 國家統一綱領 204

2. 李六條 206

Ⅱ. 臺灣의 對中國 交流協力法制 208

1. 臺灣地區의 現行法規制度 208

2. 臺灣의 大陸事務에 관한 基本法規 209

3. 臺灣의 大陸事務에 관한 入出境規定 211

4. 臺灣의 大陸事務에 관한 三通 規定 215

5. 臺灣의 大陸專務에 관한 法政社會 規定 221

Ⅲ. 臺灣의 對中國 交流協力法制와 外國人投資 奬勵制度 223

第4節 中園·臺灣의 交流協力法制의 示唆點 225

Ⅰ. 兩岸間 經濟交流協力의 制度化 225

Ⅱ. 中國·臺灣間 經濟交流協力의 特徵 226

Ⅲ. 半官半民 機構를 통한 交流協力 活性化 228

Ⅳ. 兩岸의 '三通'에 대한 展望 229

Ⅴ. 南北交流 關聯 民事問題 解決 對備 230

Ⅵ. 經濟政策面에서 南北韓과 兩岸의 差異 231

第4章 南北交流協力法制의 改善方案 232

第1節 南北交流協力法制의 間題點과 改善方向 232

Ⅰ. 南北交流協力法制의 改善의 必要性 232

Ⅱ. 南北交流協力法에 대한 問題點 提起 234

Ⅲ. 南北交流協力法의 一部 改正과 課題 242

1. 南北交流協力法의 改正 242

2. 南北交流協力法의 課題 245

3.「南北協力基金法」의 改善方案 249

第2節 南北交流協力法制의 立法整備 方案 251

Ⅰ. 南北交流協力法制의 體系化 方案 檢討 251

1. 立法方向 251

2. 南北交流協力에 관한 基本法制化('南北交流協力基本法'의 制定) 253

3. '南北關係發展基本法'(案)과의 關孫 254

Ⅱ. 交流協力關聯 法令의 立法方案 257

1. 南北經濟協力 支援 등에 관한 法律(「南北經濟協力에 관한 特別法(案)」의 新設) 257

2. 社會文化 交流協力 活性化 및 支援에 관한 法律(「南北社會文化協力에 관한特別法」의 新設) 265

3. 南北離散家族相逢 및 交流에 관한 法律(「南北離散家族交流등에에 관한特別法」의 新設) 268

Ⅲ. 對北韓支援 關聯法制의 立法方案 269

1. 立法方向 269

2. 關聯立法의 主要內容 檢討 270

第3節 兩岸關孫法制에 대한 南北交流協力法制의 示唆點 및 改善方案 277

Ⅰ. 兩岸交流協力制度의 南北交流協力 制度化의 援用可能性 檢討 277

Ⅱ. 兩岸法制의 南北交流協力法制에 대한 援用事例 檢討 279

1. 兩岸間 交流協力機構의 運營과 南北交流協力機構의 改善方案 279

2. 兩岸間 紛爭解決方法인 仲裁制度의 南北交流協力에의 示唆點 286

Ⅲ. 中國의 對臺灣 大陸投資偶對制度와 北韓의 對南한 對北投資 優待의 制度化 292

1. 北韓의 對南한 對北投資 優待의 背景 및 必要性 292

2. 北韓의 對南韓 對北投資優待 制度 293

3. 北韓의「南韓同胞投資保護法」(假稱)의 立法方案 檢討 295

Ⅳ. 南北經濟交流協力의 法制化 課題 298

1. 北韓의 南韓投資優待措置를 위한 課題 298

2. 南北交流協力의 擴大를 위한 國際法的 法制化 措置 300

第5章 結論 306

<別表-1> [南北交流協力 關聯法制의 現況] 313

<別表-2> [南北間 會談 開催現況] 317

<別表-3> [南北交流協力 關聯 合意의 現況] 319

<別表-4> [南北經協關聯 國會批准 9個 經協合意書] 321

<別表-5> [南北交易 現況] 322

<別表-6> [南北間 陸路利用 出入 現況] 323

<別表-7> [南北間 直接連結 電話 現況] 324

<別表-8> [南北間 間接連結 電話 現況] 325

<別表-9> [南北間 航空機 運航 現況] 325

<別表-10> [南北間 協力事業 및 事業者 現況] 326

<別表-11> [中國과 臺灣의 交流協力 提議年表] 327

<別表-12> [北韓과 中國의 經濟改革 및 評價 比較] 328

<別表-13> [南韓의 統一部 組織圖] 329

<別表-14> [南韓의 統一部 主要 業務內容] 330

<別表-15> [南韓의南北經協 關聯 政府部處와 主要 業務] 331

<別表-16> [臺灣의 海峽交流基金會 組織圖] 332

<別表-17> [北韓의 交流協力 關聯法規] 333

<別表-18> [中國의 對臺灣交流協力 關聯法規] 336

<別表-19> [臺灣의 對中國交流協力 關聯法規] 338

<別表-20> [兩岸經貿統計表(1991~2005年)] 346

<別表-21> [兩崔交流統計資料] 347

<別表-22> [南北韓關係와 兩岸關係의 比較] 354

<參考文獻> 355

<Abstract> 380