[학술논문] 북한 민족주의 역사학의 궤적과 환경
...their system since 1990. They clarified the Korea nation-first-principle in public as one of crisis breakthrough and historical group created new mythology and ancient history. The restoration of Dangun tomb and the civilization of Daedong River can be examples of that. The characteristic in the path of national history naturalization in North Korea is the formulation and balance of the category in ‘people'...
[학술논문] 북한 민족주의 형성과 反美 애국주의 교양 —사회주의적 애국주의와 ‘국가적 위기’의 결합—
...at the time of the new international order and social change around 1958. Simultaneously, Sincheon Museum was just beginning to play a role as the hub of anti-Americanism. North Korea was in a national crisis when U.S. nuclear weapons were installed in South Korea. North Korea Worker’s Party chose an independence route when the Sino-Soviet border conflict broke out. This socialist patriotism...
[학술논문] Between Liminality and Liminoid:Issues and Dilemma of Northeast Asia
...show that, although moves towards the Asiatic national foreign policy can be observed, transnational biases determined choices that involved the rise of military force. Presumably Northeast Asia should be needed to further increase awareness on the need for setting the regional multilateral cooperation so as to effectively prevent and respond to any crisis that occurs in the region. Presently, it is...
[학술논문] Sino-ROK Relations at a Crossroads: From Qiutong cunyi (求同存異) to Yizhong qiutong (異中求同)
...bilateral ties and the growing gap in their respective national power; and d) a widening gap between official rhetoric and reality. It is in this changing context that whenever bilateral disputes arise, they tend to spur popular resentment toward the other side. It is also worthwhile to remember that one major dimension of the Cheonan crisis is the growing awareness of the importance of U.S.-China...
[학술논문] RECASTING THE ‘INTER-KOREA’ IN NATIONAL RECONCILIATION
...Korean public can appropriate social and historical claims about the inter-Korea relationship that range from the atrocious and violent events in the war to the so-called North Korean human rights crisis. I argue that two Koreas’ reconciliation can come through resisting the romanticization of Koreans’ own normative commitment to idealized national authenticity and liberal human rights.