[학술논문] 동북아 주요 국가의 탈북자 정책 : 재외 탈북자문제와 대량탈북 가능성을 중심으로
...and other countries that are reluctant to grant the defectors protection and shelters. The Chinese government has labeled all North Korean escapees as illegal immigrants. Unless a dramatic incident such as “planned defection” happens to catch the world media, the defectors are destined to forcibly repatriation to North Korea. Once returned, they are subject to imprisonment, harsh torture, or even death...
[학술논문] 중국에서의 UN인권조약 이행 - 탈북자 보호문제를 중심으로 -
...the states which accommodate the defectors from North Korea who does not want to come back to North Korea should provide them at least temporary protection and apply the principle of none-refoulement. In order to promote world peace and security, the most powerful tool is iInternational Human Rights Law. Human rights protection of peoples and North Korean refugees in China depends not on lack of applicable...
[학술논문] 분단과 전쟁의 디아스포라-재일조선인 문제를 중심으로
...they, especially, came to be repatriated to North Korea from 1959 to 1984. Their repatriation to North Korea was due to the secret talks and conspiracy between North Korea and Japan. Another accomplice was the strange connivance of super states, that is, U.S.A, former Soviet Union, and China. Probing the matter to the bottom, this paper tried to prove that the repatriation resulted in the long confrontation...
[학술논문] JAPANESE WIVES OF RESIDENT KOREANS AND THEIR “REPATRIATION” TO NORTH KOREA
...resident Koreans (zainichi Koreans) to North Korea through the so-called “repatriation program” carried out from 1959 to 1984. The history of the mass repatriation of resident Koreans from Japan to North Korea is beginning to be unearthed, but stories of Japanese spouses who moved to North Korea with their Korean families have remained largely untold. This article attempts to break the silence of Japanese...
[학술논문] 1950년대 후반 북송문제에 대한 한·미·일의 인식과 대응
...process of sending them to North Korea. Indeed, diplomatic pragmatism was at play in the course of the "repatriation" and the matter was masked as an issue of human rights, under the circumstances of acutely contradicting interests among Korean, US and Japanese governments. It is in this respect that no party among the three governments of Korea, US and Japan can claim immunity to their accountability...